Ray-traced 3Dįirst of all, you need to know how to change from the Classic 3D renderer to the Ray-traced 3D renderer. So let’s investigate the pros and cons of our next renderer: the older Ray-traced 3D renderer. However, if you want to have text or shapes that have true 3D depth, you’ll need to use one of the other 3D renderers. This became a style that many people use for all kinds of videos. Then with a flick of the 3D switch, the Z dimension position is added, and your flat layer has been turned into what is essentially a card. The Classic 3D system only needs but a few 2D layers with the inherent X and Y position dimensions any layer would have. Here's an example of 2.5D style 3D rendered with After Effect’s Classic 3D renderer. ![]() It only supports 2.5D 3D which is that diorama style of 3D. This one has been around forever, and it’s the fastest of the three renderers. See also: 5 tips for creating amazing logo animation in After Effects Classic 3D This will help you know what’s available now, and which one is best for your next After Effects 3D composition. Let’s take a look at what the capabilities and limitations are for all three renderers. Since then, however, there is now the CINEMA 4D renderer as a third choice for 3D renderings. Until the After Effects CC 2017 update back in November ( see what's new), we only had two options for 3D renderers in After Effects: Classic and Ray-traced.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |